Για ενημέρωση και προτάσεις. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Astor Nummelin Carlberg <astor [ at ] openforumeurope [ dot ] org> Date: Fri, Nov 29, 2019, 10:36 Subject: [OFE FOSS Community List] Re: Notes and Agenda: OS Workshop Debrief Call, 26 November, 17:30 CET To: Open Source Community List <foss-community [ at ] openforumeurope [ dot ] org> Dear all, Thanks for your patience in waiting for the notes from the debrief call. Due to travel, I didn't get them together until now. Notes Workshop Debrief Call Attendees Simon Phipps, OSI Axel Brauk, SUSE Paulo Ribeiro, ESOP Mirko Boehm, OIN/OSI Brendan O’Connor, GitHub Stefane Fermigier, CNLL James Lovegrove, Red Hat Despina Mitropoulou, GFOSS Timo Väliharju, COSS Stuart Mackintosh, OpenUK Paula Grzegorzewska, OFE Cedric Thomas, OW2 Luis Busquets, European Commission Lara Tottolo, Bosch Astor Nummelin Carlberg, OFE Quick (!) summary of feedback submitted/planned There was agreement among the participants that the workshop “Open Source beyond 2020” was a success, both in terms of topics discussed and execution. The point was made that this is a first step in the context of the new Commission, and it will be followed by reports, studies and more workshops. It was also raised that we need to move towards an agreed foundation of knowledge and assumptions, from which we can start discussing policy steps forward. Q&A with DG Connect 6 December: Deadline if you want your feedback to be included in the workshop report Mid to end January: Longer input or position papers that can be handed over to the Commissioner around the time of the internal handover of the WS report. What to include/focus on: Argued policy actions that are in the remit of the Commission. The ultimate goal of the EC is to increase opportunities and welfare of the citizens of Europe. This should be kept in mind generally, when proposing policy actions. Collaboration on feedback (From Stuart’s follow-up email) During the debrief call today, we agreed to work collaboratively on a response to the commission. The first target is an outline of issues and short summary for inclusion in the Commission report on the workshop and the Commission plan to publish January 2020. Second is a fuller response to be created by our community which the Commission would like to circulate with their report in January 2020. The key topics are being outlined on a shared document here: https://codimd-ofe.projects.opusvl.com/DAfxVOOGQVGP9aqN35henQ# Each topic has a sub-page assigned where the details can be expanded. Note that details have been added to the main list and this will be moved to the sub-pages. Our first priority is to agree what the themes or subjects are to be outlined in the response required next week - then these can be expanded on. However feel free to share thoughts on any topic in the sub pages - we can then summarise as required. All the best, Astor On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 at 18:24, Astor Nummelin Carlberg < astor [ at ] openforumeurope [ dot ] org> wrote: > Hi all, > > It was great seeing so many of you at the Commission workshop last week. I > believe it is an important signal that the Commission organised this, and > it was great that so many showed up! > > That being said, we should also keep in mind that now the next phase of > the work starts, both for the workshop attendees and organisers. There was > a lot of information shared and points debated during the two days, which > means that there is a lot to synthesise. > > You should have been notified that we have a workshop debriefing call next > Tuesday 26 November at 17:30 CET, for those interested. Ahead of that I > would like to make some general points and suggest some formalities for the > call. If you plan to attend the call, or submit written input to the > Commission, take a moment to read the points! > > Different parts of the Commission > > There were three Directorates-General of the Commission organising panels > at the workshop: > > - > > DG CONNECT (Communications Networks, Content and Technology) > - > > DG DIGIT (Informatics) > - > > JRC (The Joint Research Centre) > > > When submitting your input, it is advisable to keep their different roles > in mind, both in terms of organising the workshop, as well as their mandate > as a DG in the Commission. They work with different aspects that relate to > OSS/OSH, but also a lot of other things related to digital policy. > > JRC’s role was the last panel, at which the Standardisation & OSS report > was presented. The other panels were co-organised by DIGIT and Connect. > > To simplify greatly, DG Connect deals with digital policy making, with > the goal of increasing the welfare for European Citizens. I believe this > perspective is important to keep in mind in our feedback/input to them. > I.e. economic impact and innovation should be considered. > > Input to Connect can be sent in via the following email address: > > CNECT-SOFTWARE-POLICY [ at ] ec [ dot ] europa [ dot ] eu > > DG DIGIT deals with the internal IT systems of the Commission (including > procurement and the Open Source Strategy), as well as supports the > development of “internal” IT strategies of Member States that align with > the Commission’s goal (here the European Interoperability Framework is an > example). > > Input to DIGIT can be sent in via the following email address: > > DIGIT-OSS-STRATEGY [ at ] EC [ dot ] EUROPA [ dot ] EU > > Format of submissions > > Connect asked for 2-page thematic documents to be submitted as input. One > suggestion here is to submit something that would go directly under one of > the panel titles, but it is of course up to you. It is advisable to make it > specific, instead of a general statement on the importance of Open Source > (IMO, just hosting this workshop signals that the EC has acknowledged its > importance). > > You could consider the format of a policy brief > <https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/policy-briefs/>. > > This call could be a good opportunity to find collaborators on the input. > Perhaps there are ways to submit feedback together (showing that there are > several stakeholders agreeing on a certain point makes it stronger). > > Here are some examples of what OFE is considering submitting feedback on: > > - > > Importance of increasing the Commission’s Institutional Capacity and > Knowledge of OSS > - > > The importance of the Open Source definition > - > > Redefining metrics for innovation (currently patents are often used as > proxy) > - > > Importance of continued and updated research (what is not measured, > will not be improved) > > > What we will not talk about > > Let’s try to avoid talking about the specifics of our feedback that we > want to submit. This would take too much time. It is more useful to discuss > how to improve the quality and coordination of the community’s feedback > submissions. The better it is, the more the Commission has to work with! > > Agenda for Debrief Call, 26 November 17:30 CET > > - > > Round of Introductions + quick (!) summary of feedback > submitted/planned > - > > Which DG should get my feedback? Just one or both? > - > > Format of the feedback > - > > Feedback collaborations > - > > AOB > > > Looking forward to talking with you next week! > > Best, > > Astor > > -- > *Astor Nummelin Carlberg* > Policy Director > OpenForum Europe > tel +32 (0)2 486 41 52 > mob +32 (0)497 69 08 53 > web http://www.openforumeurope.org > Follow us on Twitter @OpenForumEurope > <https://twitter.com/OpenForumEurope> > -- > OpenForum Europe AISBL > Registered office: Avenue des Arts 56, Brussels 1000, Belgium > -- *Astor Nummelin Carlberg* Policy Director OpenForum Europe tel +32 (0)2 486 41 52 mob +32 (0)497 69 08 53 web http://www.openforumeurope.org Follow us on Twitter @OpenForumEurope <https://twitter.com/OpenForumEurope> -- OpenForum Europe AISBL Registered office: Avenue des Arts 56, Brussels 1000, Belgium -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Source Community List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foss-community+unsubscribe [ at ] openforumeurope [ dot ] org. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/a/openforumeurope.org/d/msgid/foss-community/CAFd_%3DrdMTk853HGuEe4q_LKcnmHx76zD57bx9kAAJLBfotQvyg%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/a/openforumeurope.org/d/msgid/foss-community/CAFd_%3DrdMTk853HGuEe4q_LKcnmHx76zD57bx9kAAJLBfotQvyg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> .
---- Λαμβάνετε αυτό το μήνυμα απο την λίστα: Επιστημονική Επιτροπή ΕΕΛ/ΛΑΚ, https://lists.ellak.gr/epistimoniki-epitropi-ellak/listinfo.html Μπορείτε να απεγγραφείτε από τη λίστα στέλνοντας κενό μήνυμα ηλ. ταχυδρομείου στη διεύθυνση <epistimoniki-epitropi-ellak+unsubscribe [ at ] ellak [ dot ] gr>.