Thanks Nikos. Glad to hear I'm on the right track. Thank you for the direction — I'll focus on the lattice and process classes. I'll go through them carefully and follow up once I have a clearer picture of how the bindings should be structured. Looking forward to it. Best regards, Abhigyan On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 at 00:49, Nikos Cheimarios <n [ dot ] cheimarios [ at ] gmail [ dot ] com> wrote: > Dear Abhigyan, > > Thank you very much for your interest in our project. > Yes you are on the right track. Our efforts are towards the expansion of > the lattice and process classes which are the heart of the codebase. > We are at your disposal for further clarification. > > Best regards, > Nikos > > 22 Μαρ 2026, 19:39, ο χρήστης «Abhigyan Tiwari <abhigyanph [ at ] gmail [ dot ] com>» > έγραψε: > > Hi Cheimarios Nikolaos, Vissarion Fysikopoulos and the Apothesis > community, > > I've been exploring the Apothesis repository and attempted a build on > Windows using MSYS2/MinGW, where I ran into a few issues — CMake > compatibility errors, missing toolchain configuration (CMake defaulting to > NMake/MSVC), and compilation failures due to C++17 features like <any> not > being supported on older GCC versions. I worked through these and opened a > PR(link <https://github.com/nixeimar/Apothesis/pull/52>) addressing all > three: > > - Bumped cmake_minimum_required to 3.10 > - Enforced C++17 standard explicitly > - Added compiler guards and Windows/MinGW build guidance > > Beyond the fix, I've been going through the codebase trying to understand > how Apothesis works internally — the simulation model, how the C++ core is > laid out, and where a Python interface would naturally fit. Still working > through it, but I'd rather do that homework before touching any binding > code. > > The Python bindings project is what drew me here. I think a pybind11-based > interface that feels natural to Python users while keeping the underlying > performance intact would make Apothesis a lot more accessible to the > research and ML community. > > I'd love to know if this aligns with what the mentors have in mind, and if > there are specific parts of the codebase I should focus on understanding > first. > > Thanks for your time. > > Best regards, > Abhigyan > ---- > Λαμβάνετε αυτό το μήνυμα απο την λίστα: Λίστα αλληλογραφίας και συζητήσεων > που απευθύνεται σε φοιτητές developers \& mentors έργων του Google Summer > of Code - A discussion list for student developers and mentors of Google > Summer of Code projects., > https://lists.ellak.gr/gsoc-developers/listinfo.html > Μπορείτε να απεγγραφείτε από τη λίστα στέλνοντας κενό μήνυμα ηλ. > ταχυδρομείου στη διεύθυνση <gsoc-developers+unsubscribe [ at ] ellak [ dot ] gr>. > > >
---- Λαμβάνετε αυτό το μήνυμα απο την λίστα: Λίστα αλληλογραφίας και συζητήσεων που απευθύνεται σε φοιτητές developers \& mentors έργων του Google Summer of Code - A discussion list for student developers and mentors of Google Summer of Code projects., https://lists.ellak.gr/gsoc-developers/listinfo.html Μπορείτε να απεγγραφείτε από τη λίστα στέλνοντας κενό μήνυμα ηλ. ταχυδρομείου στη διεύθυνση <gsoc-developers+unsubscribe [ at ] ellak [ dot ] gr>.